Golgafrincham here we come
Not quite where we started to. …
British Petroleum > BP > Transocean Ltd > Marshall Islands > Deepwater Horizon > Gulf of Mexico > USA.
On no occasion is a nation required by law to permit any company from operating in it.
The Gulf of Mexico has been the home of porly/badly and plain un~ regulated oil drilling in the GoM.
At no point did the law enforcement agencies find any fault with the Deepwater Horizon.
The rig is from the Marshall Islands. That's a US dependency last I heard.
Transocean Ltd is a Swiss firm with offices in the USA and Brtain.
The rest you can get from Barack Obamma.
I'm not sure where the Bushes crawled out of the p1cture.
Now ask yourself with the knowledge of everything that is going on, why is BP the only party in this czjd storm that is not throwing czjd? A lot of the misdirection that is coming from the White House is aimed at not discussing the the other companies involved and the musical chairs involving the quasi political shennannigans going on over financial and legal laws of ships and other maritime businesses registered in the Marshal Islands?
How much of the lack of responsibilities is actually White House responsibility?
What reasons are there behind the US company that actually owned the rig and the business of running the contract having a Swiss address?
How long has Switzerland prospered from it naval history?
And how is Halliburton involved in all of this? Is that company involved or have I been mislead into thinking something not openly discussed is in fact just Swiftboating?
I've picked up from something online, that haliburton is a company involved halfway bewteen BP and the rig owners.
And my own personal dislike for a company linked to the Gerge "Hurricane Katrina" Bush era.
As I find links over the next few days, I will add them to this post.