From an early programme on the subject of volcanoes.
It served as my introduction to the subject and for decades since I have believed the most of it.

However not even the experts do that: …

Volcano Hell
First shown: BBC Two, Thursday 17 January 2002


There are hundreds of volcanoes spread across Latin America. Popocatépetl is one of the most deadly. Two million people live in its shadow and their lives may now be under threat. The question is: should they be evacuated, or is it safe to leave them in their homes? It is one of the toughest questions that scientists have to face.

DAVID HARLOW (US Geological Survey 1971-1994): This kind of stuff gives you grey hair and makes this business very tough. You're driven by saving lives and at the same time you don't want to make people miserable for nothing.

NARRATOR: To make the right call scientists have to predict when the volcano will erupt and that's the one thing that's been impossible to say, but there is a man who thinks he knows. Bernard Chouet believes he may have found a way to predict when a volcano will erupt and he knows what's at stake.

DR BERNARD CHOUET (US Geological Survey): When one looks at these kind of natural phenomena, you always think of the impact on human lives. The ultimate quest is to understand enough about the activity in that volcano to predict an eruption.

NARRATOR: The most tragic disaster in recent volcanic history began quietly enough. In Colombia in the winter of 1984, high up in the Andes smoke was seen rising out of the summit of Nevado del Ruiz. For the local people who lived on the flanks of this vast, 6,000m volcano, it was an alarming sight.

A small team of scientists travelled to the top of the volcano to investigate the vast quantities of volcanic gas. Nevado del Ruiz had come alive for the first time in over a hundred years.

The investigation was led by Marta Calvache. She went to the National Library and tracked down old documents detailing previous eruptions on Ruiz. Calvache read how the glacier had been melted by a volcanic blast causing huge rivers of mud and ice to pour down the valleys destroying everything in their path.

DR MARTA CALVACHE (Colombian Institute of Geoscience): A lot of people died and they describe how they died. Some of them were in the mud and people were not able to help them for several days and they died there because of the sun, because of the lack of water and food. The details of the description were very frightening.

NARRATOR: The description so alarmed Calvache that she drew up a hazard map. If the volcano erupted the blast would melt the glacier causing water to pour off the mountain. What concerned her most was the eastern flank. There was one valley but it was fed by two rivers. She saw how the water would pick up mud and rocks and thunder down both rivers. Then they would meet, doubling their power. Calvache followed the path of the river still further. There, 40 miles away, lay , a town of 30,000 people.

NARRATOR: Volcanoes can be active for years without erupting and to go to the crippling expense of uprooting people from their homes for an indefinite period just because a volcano had started to rumble seemed absurdly wasteful. The authorities would only evacuate Armero when they had the answer to one question: when would Ruiz erupt?
The scientists couldn't tell them.

FERNANDO GIL (Colombian Institute of Geoscience): The volcano is incredibly complicated and we were unable to give them a prediction. That is we couldn't tell them how big the eruption would be and we couldn't tell them when it would happen. We felt impotent.

NARRATOR: >>>>>>> On November 13th 1985 <<<<<<< the scientists ran out of time.

MARTA CALVACHE: It was very, very dark, it was raining, raining very strongly, it was really especially bad weather.

{This is the sort of stuff that follows a singularity.

Dry or wet the weather will pay its debt.}

FERNANDO GIL: Around nine, when we were about to go to sleep, we began to hear sounds coming from the volcano. We went to the main door and looked towards the mountain. It was overcast, but explosions like flashes of lightning could be seen. The sound got louder, but all the time there were these muffled sounds.

NARRATOR: What Fernando Gil was listening to was the sound of a blast of hot volcanic gas melting the glacier. The river of mud was on its way down the valley.

NEWSREADER: BBC News at 6 o'clock. Thousands of people, one estimate says 20,000, are thought to have been killed in South America after the eruption of a volcano in Colombia. The town of Armero is reported to be buried under six feet of mud and water and many of its 23,000 inhabitants are missing.

MARTA CALVACHE: It was really shocking to see. You don't realise, wait, those are bodies and then you see one and you start to distinguish many, many, many, many, many bodies there. It was difficult.

NARRATOR: 20,000 people died that night and over the next few days as rescue workers struggled to dig the survivors out of the mud.

FERNANDO GIL: It was a very difficult thing to face. It was absolutely devastating that we had warned the people that this could happen, but we were unable to tell them exactly when.

DAVID HARLOW: The scientists involved with that, including me, were impacted by that failure. A group of us resolved to not let that happen again.

NARRATOR: They went back to basics. What actually made volcanoes like Ruiz erupt? It came down to something common to all active volcanoes – magma.

Magma is molten rock that pushes its way into a volcano through the Earth's crust.


The magma then rises up the volcano. If, like Ruiz, the top of the volcano is sealed the magma has nowhere to go. The pressure increases and eventually the volcano will blow.

{But they are never completely sealed are they. There is always something venting to show that thhe mountain is active. And if there is a vent open it shows that the inner chamber has a leverage that stops a build up or has a means of blowing a safety valve.}

PROF BILL McGUIRE (Benfield Greig Hazard Research Centre, UCL): That magma has to get to the surface and so volcanologists and those monitoring volcanoes have to identify that magma and to spot it as it moves up towards the surface.

NARRATOR: Scientists believe the key was to track the magma. The problem was, they couldn't see inside volcanoes, so to track the magma they had to rely on external tools. One method was favoured above all others. It was seismology. Seismology is the study of earthquakes, literally the recording of the sounds when rock cracks or breaks and in active volcanoes they may be small, but there are hundreds, sometimes thousands, of earthquakes.

BILL McGUIRE: Seismology has been studied on volcanoes since the middle part of the 19th century and it's critical because you don't get a volcanic eruption without seismic activity, without earthquakes.

NARRATOR: For years seismologists had analysed the thousands of seismic signals from active volcanoes and one signal stood out above the others. They called it the A-type. It was instantly recognisable. It had a clear beginning and tailed off quickly. It was the sound of rock breaking.

{Or something.}

DAVID HARLOW: A great hope was that these A-types would be the great predicator or forecaster of eruptions in that as this magma pushed itself closer to the surface we see an ever increasing number in A-type earthquakes or rock fracturing events.

NARRATOR: Seismologists knew that only one thing could break rock in a volcano – magma.

Seismologists did not know anything else that could break rock in a volcano but magma. And even that was a theory.}

As magma churns its way up a volcano it breaks through the rock.


By tracking the A-types scientists hoped to detect a pattern which would help them see where the magma was inside the volcano and how fast it was rising to the surface. And in Colombia scientists seized on the data from Ruiz convinced they would find a pattern of A-types. Find that pattern and they'd cracked the problem of prediction.

DAVID HARLOW: The idea was that if we plotted those together that the trends of those numbers would tell us something about the eruptive potential of a volcano.

NARRATOR: But the more they looked the more they found there was no pattern, not on Ruiz or on any other volcano. For all their hopes the A-types had proved to be a dead end.

{So how come they were not showing up in increasing quantities as the long period events arrived? Or were all the seismic signals actual ly caused by something different to their theories?}

DAVID HARLOW: Every volcano created its own pattern and, and it was almost impossible to come up with a chart saying that this is the book that we're going to go by.

{Suppose short period events are also caused by weather. Some other sort of weather or a weather pattern caused by the same thing as long period events but with a different shape to the volcano?}

NARRATOR: Seismology had fallen short. It would take the arrival of a different kind of scientist to deliver volcanology out of its confusion. He trained as an engineer, then as a physicist, then as a rocket scientist, but for five years Bernard Chouet had locked himself in his office attempting to solve what the rest of science said was impossible: understanding when a volcano will erupt.

BERNARD CHOUET: I realised that volcanoes were relatively poorly understood and so this was a frontier that was worth exploring.

NARRATOR: When Chouet arrived in Colombia he, too, went straight to the seismographs. He saw how before the eruption the scientists had plotted the A-types desperately searching for a pattern.

BERNARD CHOUET: They had paper records at the time. I noticed that they had, of course, a lot of A-type earthquakes and they were all identified with a little sticker.

NARRATOR: But something else had caught his eye. Tucked in amongst the A-types was another signal. Scientists knew about it. They'd even given it a name: the B-type, but no one knew what it meant.

DR NORMAN BANKS (US Geological Survey 1967-1999): It was a mystical sort of thing. We didn't really understand fully what it was, nor did we understand that we could use it.

NARRATOR: The B-types were a conundrum. Unlike the A-types, they had no clear beginning and they tailed away slowly. Often they would merge with other signals making them hard to see at all.

DAVID HARLOW: What was really difficult to separate them and say definitively well it was this type of event that we'd be hopefully forecasting. They were too messy.

NARRATOR: But Chouet could see something in them that no one else could see.

BERNARD CHOUET: It stared you in the face. Wow, this is obviously different. Embedded in the record among all these A-type earthquakes were classic looking quasi-monochromatic harmonic signatures, beautiful textbook examples.

The easiest way to visualise the difference between these two types of event is to draw them.
The A-type event is characterised by a sharp onset. This sharp onset here is a signature, it's a sound of rock breaking. In other words, we're seeing the brittle failure of rock material.
The long period event is characterised by this slow onset, gradual build-up of energy in the signal and then slow decaying single tone which lasts for a while.
This emergent or slow onset and then gradual decay of that signal tone, what we're seeing here is resonance.

NARRATOR: All around us we hear sounds that are resonating. In scientific terms resonance is the sound of a gas or a liquid put under pressure.<<< WHAT? WTF?

BERNARD CHOUET: In this church we have a beautiful example of organ pipes. It's a musical instrument that is an excellent example of a resonator. A pipe filled with air you are pumping in.
The air vibrates and you hear the vibration, that tone.

NARRATOR: As the air is pumped under pressure into an organ pipe it resonates, it vibrates and produces a single tone that gently fades away. On a graph its signature is unmistakeable. A long period event.

{Actually as it enters the pipe it is losing pressure. IIRC, the passage though an orifice that is a venturi device indicates a lowering of pressure compared to the outer "atmosphere".}

NARRATOR: Chouet realised the same process was taking place in a volcano. Just as air is under pressure in an organ pipe, so magma and its gases are under pressure as they travel up the cracks of a volcano. They will resonate inside each crack producing a long period event.

I don't think so.}

… With each injection of magma into the crack another single tone of resonance will be heard, another long period event. But there is one key difference between a volcano and an organ – air can escape from an organ.

{So the volcano is not a duplicate of a resonance box? It is not like a siren or a musical instrument?

"After 70 years of sleep the Mexican volcano Popocatépetl has awoken. A plume of gas rises from its 6,000m summit."

"The most tragic disaster in recent volcanic history began quietly enough. It was Colombia in the winter of 1984. High up in the Andes smoke was seen rising out of the summit of Nevado del Ruiz. The smoke was vast quantities of volcanic gas."

Helmholtz resonators convert two similar sounds into nothingness by playing one off against the other. It produces the opposite effect to amplification. The opposite of superposition or destructive interference. Anti-noise.

What is missing from the theories about all the above and below is that the closing of a vent allows a build up of gasses. Except that there should be no more gasses assuming the vents allowed all previous gasses to exhaust.

Once the gasses have access to the air they will void. Once voided where does the gas come from? Yet they smoke indefinitely as long as there are vents to void from.

So it is a continually generated process of gas production.

And we have still to discern where the original heat comes from.

OK once the chamber is filled it carries on letting out magma. Why and how? If the centre of the earth is molten the centre of the earth will still stay where it is. There is no reason for it to leave is there?

So why does lava flow out? Something is pouring it up a tube. How and why? It is too heavy to rise of its own volition. And any gasses in it will rapidly boil off as soon as access to the open air is available.

What laws of motion cause rocks to climb up a mountain and fall into the sky?

The only thing it might be is acoustics.
We know that sound can equal pressure and pressure can be exchanged for heat. Maybe heat can be generated by the sounds arriving in the volcano. Once the volcano is closed, the mechanism is adiabatic -except for the arrival of sound.

As long as the sound continues to arrive the pressure can increase, or change to heat. Once closed, the increase in heat can evolve more gas (if the gas isn't constantly being produced by thermpilic biomass.)

It is assumed that the tones called "A waves" are from collapsing rocks.

But if the chamber is filling; the magma, even if it is forcing the rocks apart, will smother them and insulate or absorb the noises made. The rocks won't fall into the magma when the magma is the mechanism opening them, will they?

How far can they fall in that instance? They have zero potential energy.

Is that not so?}

BERNARD CHOUET: Now if I were to cap the organ pipe with my hand or with a cork, each time I pump the air in there raise the pressure in a pipe and so if I repeat this pumping action more and more and more the pressure keeps rising, eventually the pipe will blow.

NARRATOR: Chouet saw that a volcano is like an organ that has been sealed. If the crater is closed at the top the magma and the gas has nowhere to go. The volcano will pressurise and eventually blow. It was the appearance of the long period events that Chouet believed signalled a volcano was pressurising.

{To describe it in mechanical terms alone leaves out the importance of its biological origins.

A volcano is a product of thermophilic bacteria that can process carbonates and sulphates and other bacteria that can process the effluvia of the first so that the balance is such that volcanoes do not blow up.

What we have to find out is what interuptions in the symbiotic behaviour of these two types of thermophilic (heat loving) bacteria occur to unbalance their activity.

I use the term bacteria because I do not know if these organisms that process rocks the way vegetables and fungi process light and salts in the earth is a life-form different from the biological groups given the names bacteria.

Previous studies have been made on cultures obtained from humous rich soils from estuaries etc. They prefer temperatures below pasteurisation temperatures but above those considered normal. There are plenty of studies of them, released to the Web, dating from the early 20th century.}

BERNARD CHOUET: This is a defining moment because suddenly you realise the volcano is speaking to you and you understand the language.

NARRATOR: Chouet then re-examined the data from Ruiz. Hidden in the records were hundreds of long period events. More and more, as Ruiz got closer and closer to erupting. It seemed the long period events were a countdown to the eruption. If only someone had understood this, Chouet believed, then the lives of 20,000 people could have been saved.

Bernard Chouet now believed that he was close to the ultimate goal of volcanology, but there also existed another very different approach to predicting when a volcano would erupt. Stanley Williams's method could not have been a greater contrast to Bernard Chouet's. He was a scientist who climbed into craters because he believed that to predict volcanic eruptions you had to get up close.

DR LARRY MALINCONICO (Lafayette College, Pennsylvania): Stan's a very aggressive scientist. He's put in some tremendous science. He believes passionately in monitoring volcanoes. It's his love. He loves to do that.

NARRATOR: What Williams was looking for was gas. Active volcanoes can produce thousands of tons of it, mainly sulphur dioxide. Scientists know these gases come directly from the magma.

LARRY MALINCONICO: Gases are the driving force behind all volcanic eruptions, whether they're lava flows, fire fountaining, and developing an understanding about gases was sort of the key to sort of understanding volcanoes and perhaps even developing an ability to predict volcanic eruptions.

{How so?
Gas must be driven off by the heat of magma in a chamber in a vent and in any place when the opening is unobstructed.

Is the gas continually evolving?
And how is a capped dome giving off the gas?
And how is the gas venting not all the gas?
And how can it provide a sign of imminent eruption?

The only way it can do this is if the biomass creating it is suddenly multiplying exponentially. But that still permits all gasses evolved to vent.

And / or the signal is producing a reaction thattt closes the dome or occurs when a dome closes; the phases and other lunar co-ordinates are in the correct sequence/planetary oscillation; and the signals it recieves evlove the right chain reaction.

What IS the chain reaction?
It is not just the long period "B" notes.}

NARRATOR: Gas scientists knew that as magma moves up the volcano so it releases more and more gas, which escapes through holes on the surface called fumaroles.

LARRY MALINCONICO: What we're looking at now is called a fumarole. As you can see it's a fairly hostile environment. As the volcano starts to heat up and magma comes closer to the surface we're going to get a component of gas coming out of here which is coming from the magma. It's going to have increased sulphur dioxide, increased HCl, the temperature's going to go up here and all over here we're going to start to see a whole lot more gas come out. It's not an easy place to work.

NARRATOR: The theory was that if they could measure the amount of gas being produced then scientists would have an idea of how close the magma was to the top of the volcano and to an eruption. Williams was convinced that gas could be used as a means of predicting volcanic eruptions. Several times he had noted increased levels of gas before an explosion, but it would be back in Colombia that his methods would be tested against Chouet's. The result would end in tragedy.

In the southern most part of Colombia stands another volcano: Galeras. In its shadow is Pasto, home to 300,000 people. For years they had lived with its quiet rumblings. Then,

>>>>>>in 1991,<<<<<<

there were signs it was entering a more dangerous phase. International scientists flocked to Colombia. Among them Stanley Williams and his colleague John Stix. They climbed into the crater of Galeras.

DR JOHN STIX (McGill University, Montreal):
There were huge amounts of sulphur dioxide being, being emitted, on the order of thousands of tons per day, which is a pretty good indicator that there was magma underneath the volcano.

NARRATOR: The gas increases told them Galeras was both active and dangerous, but they then discovered something that really alarmed them: a lava dome.

JOHN STIX: When you see lava domes well you think um, this isn't so good because pressure can build underneath lava domes and oftentimes lava domes get blown out, blown out of craters.

{Once a dome has formed it takes a finite force to remove it. But generally even though there are adjacent venting "fumaroles" etc., the volcan explodes with more than enough power to send the cap into space.

The eruption continues long after the dome has been and gorn.}

NARRATOR: Lava domes are a sign volcanoes are about to pressurise. Fresh magma breaks through the crater and creates a dome of lava. While the dome stays open the gas can escape, but if it seals the gas is trapped and the volcano pressurises. An explosion is guaranteed.

{What is a dome formed of?
Is it the by product of a biological phenomenon?

Lime stone cracks heal themselves. Pipes used to tranfer hot water from limestone reservoirs tend to silt up with limestone. It is easy to see that limestone may also be the effluent of biological species or genuses.

Why not glass, obsidian, or tuff etc.?

If magma chambers are thermophili colonies their counterparts might be thermophili reacting to their produce. When a life form eats rock and reduces it to glass and gass, another life force might be rendering the sulphur produces to sulphates with the aid of water.

Whole systems of symbioses may be going on that we are unaware of.}

Williams and Stix confirmed the volume of gas was a sign that fresh magma was still being forced up the volcano and would seal the dome. They said an explosion at Galeras was a virtual certainty, but they were not the only scientists in Pasto. Bernard Chouet was there too. He agreed with Williams and Stix that Galeras would erupt when the dome sealed, but he went further and refined their prediction. He told the Colombians they would know the dome had sealed by looking at the seismographs. When the volcano began to pressurise a new seismic signal would appear.


FERNANDO GIL: He had this idea that if the dome sealed we would see a particular kind of seismic signal.

{When the volcanic pipe is blocked it emits a musical note just like an open organ pipe?}

NARRATOR: The signal would be a long period event.

{When a musical instrument such as a trumpet is working, the horn is enclosed by the musician and by the outer atmosphere. In other words the top end is wide open. Side vents such as trumpet valves merely increase the range of tones permitted. The oscillating medium is still enclosed.}

DAVID HARLOW: They could expect to see these small, regular beat, long period events building up.

{But it isn't exhaust from a pipe doing it!}

NARRATOR: For a while nothing appeared on the seismographs. No long period events, nothing out of the ordinary at all. Life in Pasto continued as normal. Then a new signal did appear. Once, sometimes twice a day, the seismographs recorded a new and ominous trace. It was a long period event and if Chouet was right then the countdown to an eruption had begun.

BERNARD CHOUET: This was an indication that you were pressurising the dome and that you're moving toward an explosion that would blow the dome apart.

NARRATOR: The area around the volcano was evacuated. Then, four days after the appearance of the long period events, Galeras erupted. No one was hurt. The only casualty: a police station that had been built on the crater rim. It seemed both methods for prediction had been proved right – Chouet's seismology and William and Stix's gas – but what happened next would be tragically decisive to the future of volcanic prediction. Six months after the eruption Stanley Williams was back in Pasto. He was hosting an international conference on volcanoes. With Galeras still active it was an ideal case study for the 50 scientists who had gathered there.

DR ANDREW MACFARLANE (Florida International University): It was a good conference. I have to say I was enjoying the conference very much, people were presenting interesting papers, it was lively. There's a sense of camaraderie, especially in a small field like that. There aren't that many volcanologists in the world.

NARRATOR: For Williams the highlight of the conference was his field trip. He told local reporters that he planned to take a group of scientists into the crater. Although Galeras was still active, Williams was confident it was not dangerous.

Just before the conference Williams had checked on the volcano's activity. He had climbed into the crater and measured the gas emissions. This time they were low, to Williams a clear sign that no eruption was imminent, but Galeras was anything but quiet. For the previous few days a familiar signal had occasionally inked its way across the graph paper – a long period event.

The two methods seemed to contradict each other. Gas measurements suggested Galeras was quiet. The long period events spelt danger. The night before the field trip Williams met with other scientists at their hotel to talk through the options: to go into the crater or not.

JOHN STIX: We were faced with a dilemma in a sense. Here was an active volcano, but a very quiet active volcano. Where were we going?

NARRATOR: They talked about the long period events. Some expressed reservations about going into the crater when these signals were appearing.

FERNANDO GIL: We were concerned by these long period events and what had happened when we'd seen them before.

NARRATOR: But Williams and Stix were not seismologists and Chouet's long period events were still relatively untested.

JOHN STIX: There was a concern, but we didn't really understand what those events were, were telling, were telling us.

NARRATOR: The one scientist who could have helped was missing. Bernard Chouet had been unable to come to Colombia. Both Williams and Stix decided to rely on the science they knew. Gas levels were low, a clear sign, they believed, that Galeras presented no immediate danger.

JOHN STIX: There was a possibility that there could be explosive eruptions in the next weeks or months and yet the activity compared to previously was extremely low.

NARRATOR: A decision had to be made about the field trip the next day.

JOHN STIX: Every volcanologist who works on monitoring active volcanoes puts himself, or herself, in that situation at some point. They have to. It's the nature of the beast.

NARRATOR: The field trip would go ahead as planned. Early the next morning the scientists set off for the volcano. It was an international team made up of Russians, Britons, Americans and Colombians, all eager to work in the crater. Williams led the party. By 9.30am they were on the summit of Galeras overlooking the active crater.

{Bloody BBC! It's typical <spit>journalism</spit> that they don't give any real data in their ear tickling czjdrammes.}

MARTA CALVACHE: We made different groups going up to the summit and most of the people were very happy.

ANDREW MACFARLANE: There was a lot of anticipation. At first you couldn't see anything and in fact when we hiked down to the crater you couldn't see the crater.

NARRATOR: 12 scientists, led by Williams, left the rest of the party and headed down into the volcano. They were joined by three Colombian tourists who had come to watch the volcanologists.

ANDREW MACFARLANE: Most of the people in the group were there to sample those fumaroles, so there was really a fairly big crowd of people around the fumaroles.

NARRATOR: Then at 9.47 the seismograph twitched into life.

For four hours the scientists worked quietly in the volcano, but at 1.30 that afternoon they heard something.

ANDREW MACFARLANE: I remembered at that time hearing three rock falls in the space of about a minute. After a couple of 'em I asked Stan, you know, you hear those rock slides and as I remembered it was right after that that the thing blew up – boom.

NARRATOR: The eruption hurled blocks of rock the size of refrigerators more than a mile up in the air.

ANDREW MACFARLANE: I was looking up and you know I could see the plume going up and it was grey and the fog around it was grey and the blocks were grey and I'm looking up trying to see something and I hear like three or four heavy impacts around me, big blocks coming in that I'm not seeing and I just think well this isn't going to work, I'm just going to have to run for it. I remember out of the corner of my eye seeing one of the tourists get hit by some big piece and it, you know, I remember thinking at the moment he looked like, you know, a fence post getting driven into the ground. It was just horrendous. No way anybody could survive something like that.

NARRATOR: Some of the group managed to escape out of the crater. Others were still being bombarded by the blast.

ANDREW MACFARLANE: You know I was running and falling, getting up, running and falling. I ran, I passed José Arles. He was obviously dead. He was lying face down, not moving and I fell down close to Stan. He had blood down the side of his face and sort of lifted his leg at me and said, "My leg is broken, it's broken, it's severed." I tried, I thought well there's only one thing I can do for him that's going to be meaningful and that's to pick him up. I tried to reach him and my legs weren't responding very well and I, you know I was too weak and I just thought, you know, if I try and do this we're both going to get killed and so I had to leave him there and that was really awful because I thought, at the time I thought, you know, I'm probably leaving him to die 'cos I don't think, I don't think I'm going to make it and he can't move.

NARRATOR: They found Andrew Macfarlane at the bottom of the crater deep in shock and with a fractured skull. Stanley Williams was also pulled out alive. It would be two years before he would walk again, but nine others had died in the explosion.

In going into the crater a team of experts had made the wrong decision. Some do believe the tragedy of Galeras could have been avoided if Williams had relied less on his gas methods and had better understood Chouet's long period events.

LARRY MALINCONICO: I think we can be a little myopic at times where we focus in on the information that we feel that we're experts on. We don't feel it's the most important area, but that we're experts on and in a science like volcanology you have to be able to look at things collectively.

BERNARD CHOUET: It's always easy in hindsight. If I'd been there of course I'd looked at the records and I would have seen immediately the parallel between

>>>>>>July and December<<<<<<

{What year? 1991 or 1985?}

and I would have started sounding bells, alarm bells in there. I know I would have done that. Whether
I would have been successful in preventing people from taking a trip to the crater on that day would have depended on how they would react to what I was saying.

NARRATOR: Chouet's long period events had proved correct, but at great human cost. Only when his work was taken up by others would volcanology make the advances it desperately needed to if it was actually going to save lives. Last year it had its chance.

It happened at Popocatépetl. The giant Mexican volcano had been active since 1993. For the two million people living on its flanks its daily rumblings had become part of their lives. Then the scientists saw a change. The seismographs recorded a new signal – long period events began to appear.

{BBC. No dates no data.}

The scientists had heard about Bernard Chouet's ideas, so they asked him to come and take a look.

BERNARD CHOUET: I told them what significance of long period events which they weren't aware of at the time.

NARRATOR: From then on they began to track Chouet's long period events.

DR CARLOS VALDES (National Centre for Prevention of Disasters, Mexico): It's like a red light flashing. When you see these signals something important is happening.

NARRATOR: And in December 2000 the long period events began to increase dramatically. Popocatépetl was pressurising.

BERNARD CHOUET: The volcano was singing its song. I mean actually this is a little like chirping if you want with these sustained waves from the long period event.

NARRATOR: The question was: when did the people need to be evacuated? Valdés knew the consequences of a false alarm. If people move from their homes and nothing happened then there would be no way they would move the next time the volcano threatened to erupt.

CARLOS VALDES: We feel so bad asking people to leave their homes and you have to keep your mind in the scientific work and say look, other volcanoes have done this, the potential of this volcano is that these particular villages could be in danger.

NARRATOR: If Valdés was to convince people to move out he had to predict exactly when the volcano was going to erupt. On 16th December the rate of Chouet's long period events escalated still further. The volcano couldn't continue at this rate for much longer.

BERNARD CHOUET: This is a siren song so to speak because it's telling you well, OK, I, I'm under pressure here, I'm going to blow at the top.

NARRATOR: Valdés had to make the decision.

CARLOS VALDES: We could clearly see that it would be between four and six in the afternoon of 18th.

{I wish I could clearly see the 18th of what.
Bloody morons. Fancy going to the expense of making a programme about it and not giving dates. How much would that have cost?}

NARRATOR: The order was given. Two thousand soldiers raced to the most vulnerable areas in an effort to get the people out in time. 30,000 people had to be evacuated in 24 hours. Popocatépetl blew, as predicted, on 18th December. It was the biggest eruption for a thousand years. Chouet's work had provided the key to the accurate prediction at Popocatépetl. Scientists had warned people of an impending eruption with confidence. No one was hurt in the eruption.

{How come the Mexicans with all their attendant problems of corruption could do that then and the USA failed so miserably under George Bush?
Makes the BBC look good. We may have the BBC but at least we don't have FEMA.}

DAVID HARLOW: It takes somebody to say look, we can really do this, we can go after this and understand what's going on in a volcano.

NORMAN BANKS: Science goes in steps, and this is a big one. In volcanology this is a biggie.

NARRATOR: It would be dangerous to suggest we're now safe from future eruptions, but the work of one man has at least offered us a chance to avoid future tragedies.


4 thoughts on “Horizontal

  1. On November 13th 1985 the disaster occurred.8 August 18:29******16 August 10:05****23 August 04:36****30 August 09:27***7 September 12:16******14 September 19:20*21 September 11:03*****29 September 00:08******7 October 05:04*****14 October 04:33****20 October 20:13**28 October 17:38*****5 November 20:07**12 November 14:20**19 November 09:04***Nothing in the pattern of phases to indicate any unusual activity. A lot of anticyclonic and tornadic stuff. If I was choosing a date it would be either the 18th/19th a week later, or 29th/30th August. Both those spells go over into thunder from the tectonic ones.(I always associate times of phases with volcanic eruptions though I don't know why. They are either that or derechos. I know nothing much of either.)Here is the loading I gave the phases again:**********************************************************The last spell occurred a week after the eruption.Of course a consultaion of the Atlantic sea level pressures will be required to correct the weather sequences.Or maybe reading the appropriate chapters of Weather Eye to see what weather occurred in Britain on the dates given.And maybe I aught to give the full year of these. I don't know when the events got going. I don't have access to the seismographs too neither.Why's that then?How to "Load" them:Every hour or the nearest hour is divided by 6.The number remaining is the number of asterisks it is given. Thus 17:15 becomes: *****.17 is dived twice by 6 with a remainde of 5.However there isn't an asterisk for zero asterisks so I can use the term: ****** for the hours:00:00; 06:00; 12:00; and 18:00.Thus 17:45 becomes: ******.A time of phase that lands midway between two hours i.e the half hour, tends to be unstable. In fact the minutes 20 past and 20 to the hour tend to produce negative Atlantic Oscillations (anticyclonic weather in Greenland, etc..)As a rule of thumb, in a positive cycle of the North Atlantic, the time of the phase at:****** usually means low overcast with either mist or drizzle.***** means cyclonic for the week over or around the UK.I have trouble with the next sequence: **** and the next but one: **.**** tends to produce volcanic activity and ** tornadic stuff; or visa versa.*** means a danger of flash floods or thunderstorms.So the band of 2 to 4 asterisks are pretty much of a muchness. I am starting to think of them as negative oscilation functions and that they might have the obverse effect in the North Pacific. (At two o'clock the sun is over the Asian Pacific Meridian or on the exactly opposite side of the planet. At 8 o' clock it is over the West Coast of North America.But that still leaves the 4th and 10th hours…And I still haven't resolved how they act when a negative cycle in the Atlantic is in effect. I have written extensively about it -probably mostly to be found prior to 2006 when my insights dried up.)

  2. Sorry about that gloop. Posted via word via open office.I have no idea who or what is at fault. Probably too much text for Opera's system. It could do with drastic cutting in any case. I'll try again later. Back soon.Meanwhile:

  3. From the Wikipedia on Bernard Chouet:Bernard Chouet[1] was born on October 14, 1945 in Nyon, Switzerland. In 1968 he received a diploma in electrical engineering from the Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, Switzerland.After graduation, he worked briefly at a Swiss robotics laboratory. Seeking an opportunity to do research in robotics, he subsequently worked at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); specifically, at the Man-Vehicle Laboratory in the Center for Space Research, which was doing research for NASA’s Apollo program to land men on the Moon. However, when NASA’s budget was reduced, he was free to pursue other interests.As a teenager, he had become interested in volcanoes. So, after completing a master of science degree in aeronautics and astronautics at MIT in 1972, he pursued studies in geophysics.His ambition was to use seismology to predict the behavior of volcanoes.In 1973 he received a master of science degree in earth and planetary sciences from MIT, and in 1976 he received a Ph.D. in geophysics from MIT. From 1976 to 1983 he worked as a research associate in MIT’s Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences.Since 1983 he has worked for the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park, California — first in its Office of Earthquakes, Volcanoes, and Engineering, and then as a member of its Volcano Hazards Team. Bernard Chouet is married to Paula Dickson; the couple have one son.[edit] Prediction of volcanic eruptionsSince 1977, Chouet’s colleague Keiiti Aki had been developing mathematical models of magma-filled fractures in volcanoes, in order to determine what seismic waves would be produced by such fractures.[2] Since 1985 Chouet himself had also been developing models of such fractures.[3]The turning point in Chouet’s research occurred in 1986, when Chouet examined the seismic records of the 1985 eruption of the Nevado del Ruiz volcano in Colombia.[4] In the seismic records, he found that so-called “B-type events” or “long-period events” had occurred with increasing frequency prior to the eruption.(“Long-period events” are the records of seismic waves that are produced by volcanic fluids surging through fissures in a volcano — a phenomenon similar to water hammer.)Chouet then used the occurrence of long-period events to predict the 1989 and 1990 eruptions of Mount Redoubt in Alaska and the 1993 eruption of Galeras in Columbia.[5][6] In 2000, Mexican officials used Chouet’s methods to predict the eruption of Popocatépetl in Mexico. (For further information, see Wikipedia's entry: Prediction of volcanic activity .)

  4. That brings to an end the first part of this discussion.I will have to look at how to clean it up but at least it is a start.The next bit goes on to dicuss frequencies and an idea I have had into what migh be causing them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s